<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tententwo.com/about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tententwo.com</link>
	<description>Cocktails, Jazz, and the Meaning of Life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 02:52:29 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark K</title>
		<link>http://tententwo.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 12:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Jeff,

Greetings from the East Coast.

I like your site very much.  Looks clean and simple at first, then I find out it&#039;s clean and detailed. Then I find it&#039;s got fine jazz as well! 

Looking forward to the day when we can mix up one of your 10 out of 10 recipes while listening to some Coltrane...

All the best...

Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,</p>
<p>Greetings from the East Coast.</p>
<p>I like your site very much.  Looks clean and simple at first, then I find out it&#8217;s clean and detailed. Then I find it&#8217;s got fine jazz as well! </p>
<p>Looking forward to the day when we can mix up one of your 10 out of 10 recipes while listening to some Coltrane&#8230;</p>
<p>All the best&#8230;</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bro</title>
		<link>http://tententwo.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>bro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 04:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Dude.
Love the site.  Very cool look, designee with out trying too hard.  Refreshing change from all the black and over-engineered crap out there.  Clean lines, readable.

Not cool enough to know why the name.

Another question:  What&#039;s with the prohibition on naked women.  I can&#039;t think of anything that isn&#039;t improved by the presence of naked women.  Not ugly naked women, of course, but attractive ones.  I realize that it might distract from the content at times if it was everywhere, but perhaps a small section off to the side that one could click on for a fix while in the middle of a longer CD review.  Sort a smile of the day. 

It occurs to me that you might start a section of truly attractive women, not Paris&#039; or Jessicas but sublimely beautiful women.  Like Nigella Lawson maybe.  Movie stars would be okay but should not be the prime targets.  I guess they&#039;re easier as there are heaps of photos of them and models and singers.  Its not a criticism, the site&#039;s cool enough as is and I guess I could always open a second tab in the browser.

Glad you finally did this, the world needs to hear your side of the story.

-Bro

PS Lil&#039;T says &quot;hi!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude.<br />
Love the site.  Very cool look, designee with out trying too hard.  Refreshing change from all the black and over-engineered crap out there.  Clean lines, readable.</p>
<p>Not cool enough to know why the name.</p>
<p>Another question:  What&#8217;s with the prohibition on naked women.  I can&#8217;t think of anything that isn&#8217;t improved by the presence of naked women.  Not ugly naked women, of course, but attractive ones.  I realize that it might distract from the content at times if it was everywhere, but perhaps a small section off to the side that one could click on for a fix while in the middle of a longer CD review.  Sort a smile of the day. </p>
<p>It occurs to me that you might start a section of truly attractive women, not Paris&#8217; or Jessicas but sublimely beautiful women.  Like Nigella Lawson maybe.  Movie stars would be okay but should not be the prime targets.  I guess they&#8217;re easier as there are heaps of photos of them and models and singers.  Its not a criticism, the site&#8217;s cool enough as is and I guess I could always open a second tab in the browser.</p>
<p>Glad you finally did this, the world needs to hear your side of the story.</p>
<p>-Bro</p>
<p>PS Lil&#8217;T says &#8220;hi!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
